The question at hand is about the viability of Jewish culture without Jewish belief.
First, check out this post in Jewcy (here) relating a debate between Rabbi Shmuley Boteach (host of tv show "Shalom in the Home" and--according to Newsweek magazine--the most famous rabbi in America) and Michael Steinhardt, the founder of Birthright Israel and an avowed atheist. The writer of the post, Abe Greenwald, asserts that Jewish culture is a byproduct of Judaism without independent life. Or, in his well chosen turn of phrase, "It would be like ordering filet mignon after ridding the planet of cattle...."
Then listen to Amos Oz who maintains that Jewish culture can encompass and explain the shul (here, click on the video link). I do agree with Oz that there is a rich Jewish culture independent of the authority granted to it by belief. However, culture's home is in the "republic of letters." For Jews, the letters are Hebrew (and to an extent Yiddish, Ladino and all the other rich langauges of the diaspora). Further, living in the "republic" requires fluency and an immersion that is not available, outside of Israel, except for the few.
For the rest of us, I maintain now as I have for quite a while: in diaspora, no shul...no Jews (believers, agnostics, atheists or otherwise).
Recent Comments