For a long time I have been an on and off again reader of Phoebe Matz’s blog: What Would Phoebe Do - subtitled The Best Francophilic Zionism in the Blogosphere. There is much to recommend in Ms Matz’s commentary, not least her articulate enthusiasm for two of the world's most wonderful cities,Paris and Tel Aviv.
In a recent post, Phoebe raises one of the most difficult issues in liberal Jewish communities: is the study of the Jews and Jewishness a route into the understanding of humanity or a lurch into “ethnocentric narcissism” (as one of Phoebe’s more unpleasant correspondents wrote)?
Let me frame it this way: If understanding Jews is akin to “getting” any other civilization, we can confidently immerse our children in its study--sure in the knowledge that we are not cloistering him or her from critical engagement with the world. Many of us who were raised in public schools can easily acknowledge the intellectual strengths we've gained in our studies of ancient Greece or modern Europe.
I believe we need to internalize a similar belief towards Jewish civilization and not see it as an alternative track from “secular study” which is provided as a sop to ethnic/religious sensibility (and we certainly need to ensure that Jewish studies time is not used for anything less than a vital part of critical engagement with the world).
I know that many good people will recoil at this point, positing an essential and relevant difference between a national civilization and a group such as the Jews (who in their religious self understanding are born from the encounter with Torah). The answer is simply that it all depends on how you do it. Serious critical engagement will always open doors in one's mind.
This conversation is not just academic. The debate in the US over charter schools immersed in Jewish civilization rages on, and I won't even mention the question of school funding here in Ontario....
Recent Comments